Suppose I wasn't the CEO of the iText Software Group. Suppose I didn't have to attend meetings. Suppose I wouldn't have to tell people what to do. Suppose I didn't have any responsibility. What would I do? I'd do the things I like! I'd do the things I'm good at! Three things jump to mind: write code, write documentation, answer questions. I've also gotten a taste for building business models.
But that's not what this blog is about.
There are 1,486,744 people active on StackOverflow:
When you're on StackOverflow (or another StackExchange forum), you can gain reputation. Reputation is expressed in points you receive when somebody likes/accepts your question or your answer to a question.
I joined StackOverflow 6 months ago. I accrued 3,407 points. Sure, I can't beat professional StackOverflow addicts like John Skeet, but in 6 months I succeeded in combining my job as CEO with a place in the top 12,000:
My next goal is to reach the top #10,000, but as my agenda is fully booked for the months to come, this is going to take a while.
When magazines such as DataNews chose their nominees for the "IT Personality of the Year", why do they overlook the online reputation of a CEO? Why do they overlook the book sales of a CEO? Why do they overlook the business results (revenue x15 between 2009 and 2012)? What are they criteria?